top of page
Reading in Library

DfE Letters and Sounds

Updated information

DfE Advice to SSP Programme Developers: Phase 1

The Letters and Sounds Phases

The former Phase 1

In order to ensure the necessary pace and progress, Phase 2 should be started at the beginning of Reception. This is consistent with other validated phonics programmes.
As Reception is the starting point for this revised programme, Phase 1 has been omitted. Those aspects of the former Phase 1 that are directly relevant to children’s phonics progress in Reception, particularly oral blending, should be incorporated into Phase 2 teaching.
‘Phonemic awareness’ – children’s ability to distinguish the separate sounds or phonemes that make up words – is a crucial skill underlying phonics and reading. However, phonemic awareness does not need to be acquired fully before phonics learning can start. In fact, the process of learning the phonemes in the early stages of a phonics programme strongly supports the development of phonemic awareness. In this respect, children do not need to wait until they are ‘ready’ before they start learning phonics. Rather, starting to learn and practise phonics is the best way to develop young children’s awareness of phonemes and their ability to distinguish them.
Age-appropriate pre-phonic learning remains essential at the Nursery stage, and much of the former Phase 1 material may be useful for teaching these younger children.
It may be helpful for some children to continue Nursery activities into Reception. If this is the case, these activities should be pursued in addition to Letters and Sounds teaching, not as part of it, or indeed in place of it.

 

During the DfE’s validation process, synthetic phonics programme developers were advised to remove Phase 1—as seen  above - on the assumption that phonics instruction would naturally develop phonemic awareness along the way. But for many children—especially those at risk of dyslexia—that’s too late. It makes the process frustrating, and they lose confidence before they've even begun.

In England, formal identification of dyslexia usually occurs between ages 7–9, well after the most effective window for intervention (Reception to Year 1) has passed. This contributes directly to what Ozernov-Palchik and Gaab (2016) call the dyslexia paradox.

The Delphi Dyslexia Definition highlights that difficulties in phonemic awareness and phonological working memory are at the heart of dyslexia. Yet most children starting school this September will dive straight into letters and sounds, without first checking whether they can actually hear, isolate, or manipulate phonemes in spoken words. At least 1 in 4 will struggle from day 1. 
 

For children who struggle to hear the speech sounds in words, connecting those sounds to letters—especially as the code becomes more complex—can feel impossible. We therefore urge reception teachers to hold back, for ten days, to implement Phase 1 with Phonemies. For many children this is not necessary - for neurodivergent children this can be the differences between reading and spelling success and failure. This 'sound foundation' really matters, for at least 1 in 4 children. It is not a risk we should be willing to take. 

Phonemic awareness—the ability to recognise and manipulate the individual sounds (phonemes) in spoken words—is widely recognised as the strongest predictor of reading and spelling success. Before children begin formal reading instruction, their ability to hear, isolate, blend, and segment speech sounds determines how easily they will learn to map spoken language onto written text.
 

1. Reading is based on Speech-to-Print, Not Print-to-Speech

  • Learning to read is not about memorising letters first—it is about understanding that spoken words are made up of individual sounds (phonemes) that can be represented by written symbols (graphemes).

  • A child who already recognises and manipulates phonemes will find it easier to attach those sounds to letters and decode words.


2. The Self-Teaching Hypothesis & Phonemic Awareness

  • The Self-Teaching Hypothesis highlights that successful readers rapidly move from explicit decoding to automatic word recognition through exposure to print.

  • However, decoding is only possible if a child can already hear and manipulate phonemes—without this ability, they struggle to break words apart and map letters to sounds.


3. Phonemic Awareness Predicts Future Decoding Ability

  • The alphabetic principle—understanding that letters represent sounds—only makes sense to children with phonemic awareness.

  • Children who cannot identify and manipulate phonemes struggle to decode unfamiliar words, leading to difficulties in reading fluency and comprehension.

  • A lack of phonemic awareness is strongly linked to later reading difficulties, including dyslexia, which is characterised by phonological processing deficits.


4. Strong Phonemic Awareness Enables Rapid Word Mapping Learning

  • Children with strong phonemic awareness learn new words more easily because they can:

    • Hear speech sounds clearly.

    • Recognise sound patterns in new words.

    • Connect new spoken words to written forms more efficiently.

  • This skill supports vocabulary growth, another key factor in reading success.


5. Research Evidence Supporting Phonemic Awareness as the Best Predictor

  • National Early Literacy Panel (NELP) (2008): Phonemic awareness outperformed all other pre-reading skills, including letter recognition, in predicting reading achievement.

  • Byrne & Fielding-Barnsley (1995, 2000): Longitudinal studies show that early phonemic awareness instruction leads to significantly higher reading achievement.

  • Snowling et al. (2003): Children with poor phonemic awareness at school entry were at high risk for later reading difficulties, even if they were exposed to phonics instruction.

  • Melby-Lervåg et al. (2012): A meta-analysis confirmed that phonemic awareness is the single most important predictor of reading development.


6. Phonemic Awareness Can Be Taught—Preventing Reading and Spelling Difficulties

  • Unlike intelligence or general language skills, phonemic awareness is a skill that can be developed through instruction.

  • Early screening and intervention in phonemic awareness significantly reduce the risk of reading failure, particularly for children at risk of dyslexia.

  • Teaching phonemic awareness before phonics ensures that children can hear the sounds they are expected to map to letters.


Phonemic Awareness as the Key to Literacy Success
 

Children who enter school with strong phonemic awareness are well-prepared to learn phonics, decode words independently, and transition smoothly into fluent reading. They can understand word mapping in both directions - to read and to spell. Our Phase 1 with Phonemies ascertains who these children are, and offers an intervention for the others. Phonemies make the sounds that many cannot identify, visible.  

Without it, as is clear within the Delphi Dyslexia Definition, phonics instruction is far less effective, and reading and spelling difficulties are more likely. This is why phonemic awareness at school entry remains the strongest predictor of reading success—it is the foundation upon which all other literacy skills are built. Word Mapping with phonics alone is not enough to learn to read and spell, but it provides the foundation on which everything else can happen.


The Reception Baseline Assessment, introduced as a progress measure in the first six weeks of school, does not assess the core cognitive risks associated with dyslexia. It omits phonological processing, working memory, and rapid naming, and cannot be used to identify children who are most in need of early support.
 

Importantly, therefore, Phase 1 with Phonemies allows teachers to identify children with poor phonemic awareness without the cognitive load of letters. When letters are introduced immediately, it can be difficult to determine exactly where issues are occurring and to take action. 
 

For example, as tested in the Phonics Screening Check, a child may fail to say the word not because they do not recognise the sound for each grapheme. They may provide the correct sounds—since this is a skill based on memory rather than phonemic awareness—but still be marked incorrect because they cannot blend them into a word. Conversely, another child may be able to blend sounds but not recognise the graphemes. Both children would receive the same incorrect mark, but for entirely different reasons—yet this distinction is not assessed.
 

By checking whether children know the grapheme values AND can blend them, we can identify when something is going wrong. While children do not need to know all graphemes immediately (and, as shown below, there are many to memorise in KS1), phonemic awareness is a lifelong skill—once acquired, it is never lost, like riding a bicycle. A child may know all the grapheme sounds and still be unable to read and spell; the key is phonemic awareness.

It is also important to note that when children first start learning phonics they loe the opportunity to develop good phonological working memory. A child blending long words with the support of Phonemies is still using phonological working memory, but with visual scaffolding that reduces cognitive demand. It’s an excellent way to develop this skill, which is essential for reading and spelling—especially when Phonemies are (by day 5) also used with Sound Pics (graphemes). Alongwise their phonics lessons they can explore any words - of any length - without facing cognitive overload.  


The Phase 1 with Phonemies 10-day programme enables teachers to analyse phonemic awareness at a deep level, as the words used are not restricted to the grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) the child is learning. A child may demonstrate strong phonemic awareness, indicating they will not be among the 1 in 4 children who struggle, by successfully blending multiple speech sounds—a skill that would be impossible at this early stage if they were required to do so using graphemes. This strengthens their phonemic awareness before they encounter longer words that require them to remember the grapheme-sound values throughout the word and blend them together. You will see Xav - an autistic child - blending 13 sounds together, to figure out the word is 'physiotherapist'

 

Why Phase 1 with Phonemies Works
 

Another reason for starting with Phase 1 with Phonemies is that it builds from what children already know—speech (even for non-speaking children).  Indeed, we are including non-speaking children as they can use the Phonemies to demonstrate they can hear the sounds they cannot - or choose not to - produce.

This approach is also familiar, unlike an arbitrary shape assigned to a sound. Listening for speech sounds is not a natural process—the only time children need to do this is when learning to read and spell.

 

By starting with speech, and a representation for speech sounds that is playful, we build confidence. Children understand what they are doing. They do not start school immediately feeling confused or bored. Many love to move, dance, rhyme, and talk. Some children have the emotional resilience to sit still while learning something they have no interest in—but many will struggle, particularly those with ADHD or autism. For these children, sitting still through an activity they find boring or confusing can be excruciating.

It is vital to get them moving and engaged. They love learning the Monster Sounds and putting them together like a puzzle—popping them into the box, using duck hands with the puppets they made, playing ‘What’s Under the Hat?’, and listening to silly rhymes. They will associate ‘letters and sounds’ with fun.

This matters. They develop an identity of a child who is curious about how words 'work', as a journey of discovery. They will not need to learn any rules. Common exception words will be easy to understand. We avid confusion, and teachers do not need to teach words as whole words as they aren't sure how to explain all these variations!   


Why Starting with Graphemes Misses Critical Information
 

When graphemes are introduced immediately, children miss vital information—that speech sounds can be represented by multiple graphemes.

For example, the sound /s/ can be written as:

  • s (as in sun),

  • c (as in Spencer),

  • ce (as in Jayce).

There are 14 different graphemes in written English that represent this single sound (as shown in the Spelling Clouds®).
 

Although children are explicitly taught only a few of these graphemes at first, what matters most is understanding the concept that multiple spellings exist. Starting with graphemes first robs them of this opportunity.

By starting with Phase 1 with Phonemies, children immediately grasp this concept because all names are Monster Mapped®. They may not yet know the phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences (how sounds map to letters), but they are introduced to the idea in a way that makes sense. They can  'follow the Monster Sounds to Say the Word' for their names, regardless of graphemes. Spelling Clouds® are on the walls.

Importantly, the Phonemies say the sound—they are not linked to one grapheme representation. This is different from traditional phonics, where 's for snake' represents the grapheme and phoneme /s/—even though:

  • It is also s as in in sugar or leisure.

  • It is also i in village - but both /i/ and /a/ in village map to the same sound!
     

English has an opaque orthography, making learning to map words far more difficult for children than with a language such as Italian or Finnish. Phase 1 with Phonemies introduces them in a way that makes sense.

Brains like things to make sense—and Phase 1 with Phonemies does just that.
 

Why Phonemies Are Essential for Speech-to-Print Learning and Word Mapping Mastery®


The written code was developed to represent speech. It was an invention that only occured fairly recently, in the history of mankind! And yet humans will always develop a spoken language. Phonemies provide a visual representation of speech sounds and can be used instead of graphemes for five days, ensuring children understand what decoding and encoding entail.
 

Importantly, this is not achieved anywhere else—children are introduced to the idea that their own pronunciation may change the "P" part of GPCs. For example, they may say:

  • bath as bɑːθ  (think of the second sound in 'bark' or check the Phonemies chart below and play the sounds on the Phonemies screen 

  • bath as bæθ (think of the second sound in Kath)

Even though the graphemes remain the same, their pronunciation differs.

This becomes critical when children must spell words using phonics, moving from speech to print. What if their speech sounds don’t align with Received Pronunciation—the sounds expected in phonics instruction?

We have a story for that! - The Speech Sound King and the Universal Code

On Day 5, children are introduced to the Speech Sound King.

📖 The Story: The Speech Sound King needed to send a message to the Prince, far away, about an ant in a pan. He realised he couldn’t draw a picture to represent the message. Instead, he created a code—a system of pictures for his speech sounds.

This code aligns with the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)—a universal phonetic system. 

By introducing this concept of 'Speech Sound Pics®' early, children understand that written English is based on this universal code. 

For example, a child in New Zealand may say chips as ʧʌps and attempt to spell it ch-u-p-s, choosing /u/ for the second sound. It is far easier to explain that the correct spelling uses /i/ because the Speech Sound King pronounces it ʧɪps.

From an early stage, children navigate both their own speech patterns and the written code of English globally.

It just makes sense. We are not asking children to change how they speak just to understand that the written  code was not designed to accommodate the accents used globally when speaking in English.  
 

The Reality: 1 in 4 Children in England Struggle
 

Although only 1 in 5 children fail the Phonics Screening Check, 1 in 4 children still leave school unable to read and spell at minimum levels.

Many of these children never developed phonemic awareness. Over 90% of struggling children aged 7+ sent to me for support have poor phonemic awareness, yet neither the parents nor the child knew.

The belief that phonemic awareness develops through phonics instruction is not true for all children. All children diagnosed with dyslexia have poor phonemic awareness. Dyslexia is an educational learning difficulty, and so changing the instruction is vital.  

With Phase 1 with Phonemies, we can identify these children early—and do something about it.

 

Conclusion
 

We know that many children can learn to read and spell with minimal explicit instruction because they have strong phonemic awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Others, however, cannot cope with the standard phonics approach that is offered in isolation, and when starting with graphemes. 

Phase 1 with Phonemies will evoke discussions about the way forward, and how we can prevent the SEND crisis from growing. Literacy matters. While we want children to choose to read for meaning and pleasure they must be ABLE to read, even if they don't. Otherwise they cannot cope at school, and will want to avoid it.  

10 days is very little, in the scheme of KS1, but could be your most powerful weapon against illiteracy – and offer an immunisation against illiteracy for at least 1 in 4 . Teachers are as ready for something different as children are! We can find out how they learn by letting them play with sounds in this way. Imprtantly, they will want to go to school and explore words because it is fun to them. Having fun is the best way to learn anything! 

Miss Emma
Emma Hartnell-Baker 

Emma Hartnell-Baker - Early Years Expert

We spend the ten days getting to know our little learners 
as the unique individuals they are. Phase 1 with Phonemies allows them to sing, dance and MOVE. We are speaking and listening to each other.  

An Alernative Perspective from Miss Emma, the Neurodivergent Reading Whisperer®

The Phonemies enable children to blend very long words! They are developing outstanding phonemic awareness and phonological working memory—without having to wait until they know all of the graphemes in the words.

This autistic child, who is non-speaking, is not held back! We design tech that 'just makes sense' to all learners, as it is schema-driven.

Children who, if taught phonics in the same way as everyone else, may seem to have learning difficulties—but when the teaching is different, they often turn out to be gifted! They simply have learning differences.

All these boys are autistic. They needed this introduction to phonics via Phase 1 with Phonemies - they understand it, and are excited by it. 

DfE Recommended KS1 GPC Teaching Progression 

Notes: 

Any material funded by the Department is Crown Copyright material and can be used by anyone. It is shared below.

Question posed to the DfE:
Can schools continue to use their own programme without having to get it validated? 

 

If your school uses its own approach based around Letters and Sounds 2007 which includes appropriate resources, has decodable books matched to pupils’ phonic knowledge, high-quality staff training and achieves strong results, there is no need to change approach. Schools should check that the approach taken is sustainable and works for all children, including the most disadvantaged.  


There is no obligation to bring a programme for validation. Applications from schools wishing to share their good practice more widely, and who have the capacity to do so, are encouraged however. Schools can continue with their approach even if it is not validated. 

It is for individual schools to decide which approach to phonics teaching they use, although the Department recommends schools consider an SSP programme from the validated list, as these programmes will have met robust criteria and will have been tested and assessed to be of high-quality.

Observation from Miss Emma
"After validation, some of these programmes have changed their policies—for example, they now teach common exception words as whole words or have removed the teaching of split vowel digraphs. There does not appear to be any ongoing testing or assessment of these validated programmes. Please do not assume that they would still meet this criteria."

 

 

Phases 2 to 5

This progression should be considered to cover phonics teaching from the start of Reception through to the end of Year One. It now starts with Phase 2 and ends with Phase 5.Despite the slight anomaly of now starting with Phase 2, the numbering of the original Phases has not been changed.In order to maintain as much consistency as possible with the original Letters and Sounds, the content of Phases 2 to 5 has largely been retained. The progression of learning within these Phases has however been updated, particularly for Phase 5.

Phonics Progression Guide
 

Reception Year
 

Autumn Term (First Half) – Phase 2 Graphemes

  • Graphemes Introduced: s, a, t, p, i, n, m, d, g, o, c, k, ck, e, u, r, h, b, f, l

  • Focus: CVC words (e.g., cat, dog, big)

Autumn Term (Second Half) – Phase 2 Graphemes

  • Additional Graphemes: ff, ll, ss, j, v, w, x, y, z, zz, qu, ch, sh, th, ng, nk

  • Focus:

    • CVC words

    • Words with -s /s/ added at the end (e.g., hats, sits)

    • Words ending with -s /z/ (e.g., his) and words with -s /z/ added at the end (e.g., bags)

Spring Term (First Half) – Phase 3 Graphemes

  • New Graphemes: ai, ee, igh, oa, oo, oo, ar, or, ur, ow, oi, ear, air, er

  • Focus:

    • Words with double letters (e.g., buzz, fizz)

    • Longer words

Spring Term (Second Half) – Phase 3 Review

  • Focus:

    • Longer words, including those with double letters

    • Words with -s /z/ in the middle

    • Words with -es /z/ at the end

Summer Term (First Half) – Phase 4

  • Focus:

    • Short vowels with adjacent consonants (e.g., CVCC, CCVC, CCVCC, CCCVC, CCCVCC)

    • Multi-syllabic and compound words

    • Words ending in suffixes: -ing, -ed /t/, -ed /i-d/, -ed /e-d/, -est

Summer Term (Second Half) – Phase 4 Graphemes

  • Focus:

    • Phase 3 long vowel graphemes with adjacent consonants

    • More complex word structures (CVCC, CCVC, CCCVC, CCV)

    • Words ending in suffixes: -ing, -ed /t/, -ed /i-d/, -ed /e-d/ /d/, -est, -er

    • Compound words
       

Year 1 – Phase 5 Grapheme Progression

Autumn Term (First Half) – Review Phases 3 & 4, Begin Phase 5

  • Review: Phases 3 & 4

  • New Phase 5 Graphemes:

    • /eɪ/ → ay (play)

    • /aʊ/ → ou (cloud)

    • /ɔɪ/ → oy (boy)

    • /iː/ → ea (each)

Autumn Term (Second Half) – Phase 5 Graphemes

  • New Graphemes:

    • /ɜː/ → ir (bird)

    • /aɪ/ → ie (pie)

    • /uː/, /juː/ → ue (blue, rescue)

    • /juː/ → u (unicorn)

    • /əʊ/ → o (go)

    • /aɪ/ → i (tiger)

    • /eɪ/ → a (paper)

    • /iː/ → e (he)

    • /eɪ/ → a-e (shake)

    • /aɪ/ → i-e (time)

    • /əʊ/ → o-e (home)

    • /uː/, /juː/ → u-e (rude, cute)

    • /iː/ → e-e (these)

    • /uː/, /juː/ → ew (chew, new)

    • /iː/ → ie (shield)

    • /ɔː/ → aw (claw)

Spring Term (First Half) – Phase 5 Graphemes

  • New Graphemes:

    • /iː/ → y (funny)

    • /ɛ/ → ea (head)

    • /w/ → wh (wheel)

    • /əʊ/ → oe, ou (toe, shoulder)

    • /aɪ/ → y (fly)

    • /əʊ/ → ow (snow)

    • /dʒ/ → g (giant)

    • /f/ → ph (phone)

    • /l/ → le, al (apple, metal)

    • /s/ → c (ice)

    • /v/ → ve (give)

    • /ʌ/ → o-e, o, ou (some, mother, young)

    • /z/ → se (cheese)

    • /s/ → se, ce (mouse, fence)

    • /iː/ → ey (donkey)

    • /uː/ → ui, ou (fruit, soup)

Spring Term (Second Half) – Phase 5 Graphemes

  • New Graphemes:

    • /ɜː/ → or (world)

    • /ʊ/ → u, oul (push, could)

    • /eə/ → are (share)

    • /ɔː/ → au, aur, oor, al (author, dinosaur, floor, walk)

    • /ʧ/ → tch, ture (match, adventure)

    • /ɑː/ → al, a (half, father)

    • /ɔː/ → a (water)

    • Schwa in longer words: (e.g., different)

    • /ɒ/ → a (want)

    • /eə/ → ear, ere (bear, there)

    • /ɜː/ → ear (learn)

    • /r/ → wr (wrist)

    • /s/ → st, sc (whistle, science)

    • /k/ → ch (school)

    • /ʃ/ → ch (chef)

    • /z/ → ze (freeze)

    • Schwa at the end of words: (e.g., actor)

Summer Term (First Half) – Review and Revise All Learning

  • No new GPCs introduced

Summer Term (Second Half) – Phase 5 Graphemes

  • New Graphemes:

    • /eɪ/ → eigh, aigh, ey, ea (eight, straight, grey, break)

    • /n/ → kn, gn (knee, gnaw)

    • /m/ → mb (thumb)

    • /ɪə/ → ere, eer (here, deer)

    • /ʒ/ → su, si (treasure, vision)

    • /dʒ/ → dge, ge (bridge, large)

    • /ɪ/ → y (crystal)

    • /ʃ/ → ti, ssi, si, ci (potion, mission, mansion, delicious)

    • /ɔː/ → augh, our, oar, ore (daughter, pour, oar, more)


      Notes on the Progression

    • Teaching Sequence: The given order of graphemes is the recommended sequence for systematic learning.

    • Teaching Pace: Approximately four new sounds per week, with regular review sessions.

    • Blending and Segmenting: Every new grapheme must be followed by practice in blending and segmenting words.

    • Common Exception Words (Tricky Words): These words cannot be fully decoded with the phonics knowledge at the time they are introduced but become decodable as learning progresses.

    • Reading Application: All phonics learning should be practised with fully decodable books, ensuring children apply knowledge systematically.

    • Schwa Sounds: The schwa (unstressed vowel sound, e.g., teacher → /t/ + /ee/ + /ch/ + /er/) is not explicitly taught as a GPC but is naturally acquired through reading.

      The former Phase 6 is concerned with what is best considered spelling development rather than phonics. However, it does not constitute a full and adequate spelling programme. It has therefore been omitted from this update and Letters and Sounds now finishes with Phase 5.

Guidance from Miss Emma: Supporting neurodivergent learners and children at risk of dyslexia by making phonics instruction more accessible and meaningful.

Use the Monster Routine that they learn in Phase 1 with Phonemies to develop spelling skills, and store words in  the orthographix lexicon

 

Strategies to Support Spelling
 

🔹 Phonemic Awareness & Phonics Instruction – Encourage breaking words into sounds and mapping them to letters, rather than relying purely on memorisation. Show the Code using the tech. This means you can adopt a 'less teaching, more learning' approach. Remember tht many neurodivergent learners are also autodidacts - they don't enjoy being 'taught', they want to discover and self-teach.  
🔹 Multisensory Approaches – Use speech-to-print activities, word mapping (like Speech Sound Mapping), and physical movement to reinforce spelling patterns. The Phonemies, and Spelling Routine, support this. 
🔹 Explicit Teaching of Morphology – Exploring prefixes, suffixes, and root words can help them recognise patterns beyond whole-word memorisation. Do that while mapping words orthographically. 
🔹 Personalised Word Banks – MyWordz - Help them build lists of commonly used words they struggle with and reinforce through repeated exposure in different contexts. Use Map and Drag.
🔹 Encourage Writing for Meaning – Connect spelling to meaningful writing
activities to improve comprehension alongside word recall.
Meaning is vital - and one of the 3 essential elements outlined within the Speech Sound Mapping Theory.  

The IPA Phonetic Symbols Represent the English Speech Sounds.
Phonemies are Fun Speech Sound Characters! 
Note from Miss Emma about the Split Vowel Diagraph in Phase 5
a-e e-e i-e o-e u-e

Because I am an early years teacher, I think about what children already understand and build on that. They understand what a sandwich is! So, I describe it as a 'Sound Pic Sandwich'—which we officially introduce at the Blue Code Level. The children will call it a Blue Level Sound Pic Sandwich! In reality, they are exposed to it much earlier. This may be because there is a split vowel digraph in their name or in the Mapped Words used during play. We show words mapped within the world around them, for example, when playing shops in the role-play corner at home or in the classroom

Children using the Speech Sound Pics (SSP) Approach for their 30 Minute Phonics Routine will also see the Sound Pic Sandwich when they watch their Duck Level (CEW) lessons. It actually doesn't need 'explaining' as such, which is the genius of a visible code! We are showing the 'letters' (graphemes) and the 'sounds' (phonemes) using a multi-sensory approach. 
Children who won't struggle can be given hundreds of words to memorise - but they have good phonemic awareness and will figure out the mapping without instruction. They always have. Lots won't. They need to be given that info.

DfE Recommended KS1 Exception Word Progression 

Common Exception Words (CEWs) Progression
 

What Are Common Exception Words?

  • Common Exception Words (CEWs), sometimes referred to as tricky words, are frequently used words that cannot be fully decoded using the grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) children have learned up to that point.

  • Many of these words cease to be tricky as more alternative GPCs are introduced.

  • While CEWs help form simple decodable sentences, learning them increases cognitive load and can disrupt systematic phonics teaching. Therefore, they should be kept to a minimum in the early stages.
     

Key Notes on CEW Progression

✔ CEWs from ‘Letters and Sounds’ have mostly been retained, with some additions (e.g., sure, pure).
✔ CEWs from the National Curriculum (not in the original ‘Letters and Sounds’) have been incorporated.
✔ The learning pace has been adjusted based on effective practice.


CEW Progression by Term


Reception

Autumn Term 1st Half – New CEWs

  • is, I, the

Autumn Term 2nd Half – New CEWs

  • put, pull, full, as, and, his, her, has, no, go, to, into, she, push, he, of, we, me, be
    📌 Words like ‘put’, ‘pull’, ‘full’, and ‘push’ may not be tricky in some regional pronunciations and should be treated accordingly.

Spring Term 1st Half – New CEWs

  • was, you, they, my, by, all, are, sure, pure

Spring Term 2nd Half – Review Only

🔄 Review all CEWs taught so far. No new words introduced.

Summer Term 1st Half – New CEWs

  • said, so, have, like, some, come, love, do, were, here, little, says, there, when, what, one, out, today

Summer Term 2nd Half – Review Only

🔄 Review all CEWs taught so far. No new words introduced.

Year 1

Autumn Term 1st Half – Review & Consolidation

✅ Review all CEWs from Phases 2–4:

  • is, I, the, put, pull, full, as, and, his, her, has, no, go, to, into, she, push, he, of, we, me, be, was, you, they, all, are, my, by, sure, pure, said, have, like, so, do, some, come, love, were, there, little, one, when, out, what, says, here, today
    📌 As before, ‘put’, ‘pull’, ‘full’, and ‘push’ may not be tricky in some regional accents.

Autumn Term 2nd Half – New CEWs

  • their, people, oh, your, Mr, Mrs, Ms, ask, could, would, should, our, house, mouse, water, want
    📌 In some regional accents, ‘ask’ may not be tricky.

Spring Term 1st Half – New CEWs

  • any, many, again, who, whole, where, two, school, call, different, thought, through, friend, work

Spring Term 2nd Half – New CEWs

  • once, laugh, because, eye

Summer Term 1st Half – Phonics Screening Check Preparation

🔄 Review all CEWs. No new words introduced.

Summer Term 2nd Half – New CEWs

  • busy, beautiful, pretty, hour, move, improve, parent, shoe

Additional Considerations

🔹 Ensuring Full Coverage:

  • All CEWs in this progression must be taught within the specified half-term block.

  • The order of teaching can be flexible, especially to match decodable books. However, care must be taken if using books from different phonics schemes.

🔹 Teaching CEWs Phonically:

  • Children must always be taught to decode tricky words phonically before being asked to read them independently.

🔹 Proper Nouns as CEWs:

  • Some proper nouns (e.g., names of children, book characters, places) may be added if frequently used and not decodable at the time.

  • However, these should be kept to a minimum, especially in early stages.

🔹 Encountering Unfamiliar Words:

  • Children will naturally see words with unlearned GPCs in books and their environment.

  • Teachers may introduce some of these as CEWs if they are essential for immediate use, but the same principles apply.

📌 Summary

✅ CEWs are words that children cannot decode yet using their current phonics knowledge.
✅ The progression is structured, with new CEWs introduced each half-term and built upon in later years.
✅ CEWs should always be taught phonically, not just memorised.
✅ Some words become decodable later, so they are only ‘tricky’ temporarily.
✅ Proper nouns and essential new words may be added at the teacher’s discretion, but sparingly.

This structured approach ensures children learn CEWs systematically, efficiently, and in alignment with their phonics knowledge.
 

Mapping 'irregular' words phonetically
CEWs with Phonemies - Showing the Letters (Graphemes) and Sounds (Phonemes)

I introduced Aussie schools to 'Code Mapping' a decade ago, as children need to see the graphemes while hearing the phonemes. 
I later introduced Phonemies as the 1 in 4 who will still struggle, even with this, need to not only see the grapheme markers and hear the corresponding phonemes, they also need to SEE the sound value for it to become secured in the orthographic lexicon. This is the Speech Sound Mapping Theory. 
For more information or to book a workshop visit 
https://www.wordmappingmastery.com/word-mapping-teacher-training 

Access the DfE recommended common exception words via the I Can Read Without You (ICRWY) Lessons app 
They are free to access by parents, without needing a subscription. 

Statutory Spelling - Common Exception Words - Mapped
Statutory Spelling - Common Exception Words - Mapped Words

Contact Us

© 2025 SEN Inclusive Speech Sound Play with Phonemies - Speech Sound Mapping from The Reading Hut Ltd

Join the Movement! Letters and Sounds Phase 1 with PHONEMIES
SSP - Speech Sound Pics - Systematic Synthetic Phonics
bottom of page